Short Communication
Volume 2 Issue 5 - 2018
Are Helminths Contributing to the Population Fluctuations of Northern Bobwhite Quail (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of West Texas?
Matthew Z Brym, Cassandra Henry and Ronald J Kendall*
The Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory, Texas Tech University, Box 43290, Lubbock, Texas, 79409-3290, USA
*Corresponding Author: Ronald J Kendall, The Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory, Texas Tech University, Box 43290, Lubbock, Texas, 79409-3290, USA.
Received: August 20, 2018; Published: August 25, 2018
The question of whether parasites can significantly influence host population dynamics is complex and debated. Since Anderson and May’s groundbreaking theoretical work revealed the potential of parasites to influence host populations, several studies have demonstrated this potential experimentally, leading to an increased consideration of parasites in this regard. One species in which this needs further study is the Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), a declining game bird that has been found to exhibit intense parasitic infections in some portions of its range, such as the Rolling Plains of West Texas. As part of a long-term effort monitoring parasitic infection of bobwhite in the Rolling Plains, we received 3 hunter-harvested bobwhite from Mitchell County, Texas in February 2018 and 9 bobwhite were captured from a research transect in the same county in March 2018. Eyeworm (Oxyspirura petrowi) and caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula) burdens for hunter-harvested bobwhite averaged 65 and 830, respectively, while captured bobwhite averaged 49 and 381, respectively. Additionally, an average of 71 trapping sessions were required to capture one bobwhite during March 2018, which was considerably higher than previous reports from this area. These extreme infection levels, as well as the increased effort required to capture a single bobwhite, coincided with widespread reports of dramatically decreased bobwhite abundance. While the sample size presented here is small, the consistency between these observations and recent reports demonstrates the need to continue investigating the effects parasites may be having on bobwhite in the Rolling Plains.
The potential of macroparasites to influence host populations has been a longstanding topic of contention amongst researchers. While factors such as resource availability, predator-prey interactions, and competition have typically taken precedence as drivers of population dynamics [1-3], the regulatory capacity of parasites has begun to garner credence in more recent times. In 1978, Anderson and May laid the theoretical groundwork demonstrating that parasites have the potential to impact host population abundance [4,5]. Since then, a number of empirical studies have shown that parasites are indeed capable of affecting host population dynamics [6], including a long-term study by Hudson., et al. [7] which found a helminthto be the underlying cause of cyclical population fluctuations of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus) on game preserves in Scotland.
Unfortunately, our understanding of the effects parasites have on populations of free-ranging wild hosts remains limited [8,9], and this is largely due to the difficulty of unraveling the complex associations of multiple variables acting on wild systems [10-12]. An example of the need for additional research into this topic is evident in populations of another galliform, the Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus; hereafter bobwhite), specifically those from the Rolling Plains of West Texas. Bobwhite are a well-studied game bird with a particularly strong sporting heritage in the Rolling Plains [13]. Because of this, considerable efforts have been made to understand the ecology of bobwhite and to develop conservation strategies that would lead to consistent and sustainable bobwhite populations [14,15]. Nevertheless, bobwhite populations in the Rolling Plains are unstable and have been declining since the 1960s [16].
In 2010, a rapid and inexplicable decrease in bobwhite abundance spurred a collaborative research initiative, known as Operation Idiopathic Decline (OID), that assessed quail populations in the Rolling Plains for the presence of disease. A significant finding of OID was widespread infection of caecal worms (Aulonocephalus pennula) and eyeworms (Oxyspirura petrowi) in quail throughout the region [17,18]. While the presence of these helminths in the Rolling Plains was not a novel discovery, as the first documented reports occurred in the 1960s [19], OID marked a turning point in the attitudes of researchers with respect to the potential impacts of parasites on wild quail populations.
Since OID, additional studies have confirmed pathological consequences associated with eyeworm infection [20-22]. There have also been suspicions of caecal worms leading to decreased vitamin A levels and malnutrition [22,23]. However, because there are a multitude of variables that affect bobwhite survival in the Rolling Plains [13], isolating and quantifying the effects parasites may have on wild bobwhite population dynamics continues to challenge researchers. While trying to determine how parasites affect quail, the Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory at Texas Tech University has documented potential impacts of parasites on bobwhite abundance and received reports from hunters and landowners expressing concerns about parasites contributing to quail mortalities in the Rolling Plains during 2017-2018 [24-26]. Here, we will discuss our continued monitoring of bobwhite and helminths during the spring of 2018 and how the perpetuation of high parasite loads amidst decreased bobwhite abundance may indicate that helminths can contribute to bobwhite population fluctuations in the Rolling Plains.
Materials and Methods
During March 26-30 2018, 9 bobwhite were collected from two transects in Mitchell County in the Rolling Plains of West Texas. Birds were captured using walk-in double funnel traps baited with milo (Sorghum bicolor) as described by Dunham., et al. [18]. Trapping effort required to capture birds was calculated by dividing the total number of trapping sessions by the total number of birds collected according to Henry., et al. [24]. An additional 3 bobwhite, shot in Mitchell County during February 2018, were donated by hunters, assigned unique identification numbers detailing date and location harvested, and returned to the lab at Texas Tech University for processing in the same manner as described by Brym., et al. [25]. The heads and caeca of all birds were dissected and examined for caecal worms and eyeworms at the lab at Texas Tech University following methods used by Dunham., et al. [27]. Bobwhite were captured, handled, and processed according to Texas Parks and Wildlife Research Permit No. SPR-0715-095 and under Texas Tech Animal Care and Use Committee protocols 16071-08.
Results and Discussion
When Henry., et al. [24] reported increased trapping effort that coincided with elevated parasite burdens in the spring of 2017, it was suspected that a parasite-induced die-off was occurring. Furthermore, this preceded a downward turn in bobwhite populations in the region [28]. The following winter, Brym., et al. [25] documented elevated parasite burdens along with hunters reporting drastically reduced bobwhite abundance in Mitchell County. Now in the spring of 2018, monitoring of this same area has shown a perpetuation of high parasite loads as well as further increased difficulty trapping bobwhite (Table 1). While the intense parasitic infections presented here may be biased due to the small sample size, the consistency of this finding with reports from the past year support the possibility that the parasite loads we documented were representative and may be contributing to concurrent bobwhite declines.
Furthermore, Dunham., et al. [27] found that only 4% of bobwhite sampled in 2014-2015 possessed an extreme infection of caecal worms (300+) or eyeworms (60+), while 67% of our samples were in the extreme infection category. They also hypothesized that eyeworms and caecal worms were long lived and infections would gradually increase to exert an unsustainable strain on bobwhite. This is supported by models that have demonstrated high parasite densities are followed by declining host numbers [4,5]. This density-dependent negative feedback mechanism has been confirmed in populations of sheep and red grouse where infection is prevalent and intense [7,29]. Consequently, it is possible that bobwhite populations from the Rolling Plains may experience a similar feedback loop, as they are also subject to widespread and intense parasitic infection.
Additionally, we recorded large differences in both parasite loads and trapping effort between our eastern and western trapping locations in Mitchell County, separated by approximately 20 km, which may provide further insight into the potential of these infections to affect bobwhite populations. Capture of birds on the western transect of our study area required approximately double the effort of the eastern transect, and the western birds possessed parasite loads less than half that of eastern birds (table 1). The difference for the eastern transect may have occurred because the critical threshold of infection necessary to precipitate a decline in local bobwhite abundance had not been met. Hunter reports for the area also indicated that bobwhite numbers were low at the beginning of the season for the western transect, while the eastern transects decrease in abundance did not occur until the end of the season (personal communication, Kendall).
Location Sample Size Trapping Effort Eyeworms Caecal worms
Trapping Sessions Trapping Session/Bird Mean Abundance Range Mean Abundance Range
Total 9 640 71.1 49 23-83 381 109-935
East 6 300 50.0 60 23-83 462 170-935
West 3 340 113.3 27 25-30 220 109-350
Table 1: Trapping effort and parasite abundance by location.
Because the die-off reported for the spring of 2017 occurred on the western transect [24], it is possible that more heavily infected birds did not survive until the following year. This could explain the reduced numbers reported by hunters, as well as the trapping difficulty and lower parasite burdens we encountered. Furthermore, the hunter-harvested samples were from the eastern transect and possessed very high caecal worm and eyeworm burdens, averaging 830 (363-1722) and 65 (48-95), respectively. These extreme parasite loads, that Dunham., et al. [27] postulated would begin to have lethal consequences, continued into March.
Moreover, amidst the extreme infection levels we documented in hunter-harvested samples, hunters reported an increased occurrence of feather piles (personal communication, Kendall). This suggests bobwhite were more susceptible to predation during this time, which may have been exacerbated by parasitic infection, as helminths can increase vulnerability to predators [30]. This is further exemplified by a hunter-harvested sample that harbored an immense load of 1722 caecal worms (figure 1) and 95 eyeworms and was sufficiently impaired and emaciated (figure 2) as to be captured by a hunting dog. Although we cannot be certain that parasites were the determining factor of this bird’s condition, it is a possibility as there is documentation of another wild bobwhite with similar parasite loads and condition that was hand captured in the Rolling Plains [26]. Furthermore, eyeworms have been associated with instances of bobwhite refusing to fly when pursued by dogs [31], and intestinal parasites akin to caecal worms are known to cause weight loss, lethargy, and even death in game birds [32,33].
Figure 1: Caecal worms (n = 1722) extracted from one Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) collected from Mitchell County, Texas in February 2018.
Figure 2: Comparison of breast tissue of Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) between a (a) typical adult and (b) heavily parasitized individual collected from Mitchell County, Texas in February 2018.
Parasites may also suppress the immune systems of their hosts [34]; thus, it is plausible that the extreme infection found in that specimen may have led to compromised immune function and susceptibility to other infections. However, research into the consequences of these parasites on bobwhite immune function is lacking, and further studies into this topic may reveal important insight into the potential of helminths to affect such a critical aspect of fitness. Furthermore, warmer winters can extend transmission and survival of parasites [35,36], and drought has been associated with greater caecal worm burdens [25]. This is concerning, as the winter of 2017-2018 in the Rolling Plains was mild and dry [37], which could have intensified the severity of these infections. For example, higher winter temperatures can prolong the life cycle and increase overwinter survival of orthopterans [38]. Because several species of orthopterans have been identified as potential intermediate hosts for both eyeworms and caecal worms [39-41], with one species that overwinters [42], extended transmission and survival may have facilitated the increased proportion of extreme infections we observed.
Unfortunately, this and many other aspects as to how parasites may be impacting avian wildlife have been neglected due to the idea that parasites are generally inconsequential in terms of population management [11,43]. While it is true that bobwhite in the Rolling Plains are often subject to a number of challenges such as scarcity of food, predators, periods of drought, and extreme temperatures [13], it is also likely that the effects of parasites do not act in isolation, but rather compound with these stressors and vice versa [44]. It is this very possibility of compounding and interdependent interactions between parasites and other variables that demands a comprehensive approach to understand bobwhite population dynamics in the Rolling Plains. While the small sample size and inferences made based on anecdotal accounts should not be misinterpreted as conclusive evidence, proactive reports such as this can provide a valuable supplement to researchers investigating the subtle yet potentially significant impacts of parasites [11,26]. Most importantly, these efforts may serve to stimulate more careful consideration of the importance of parasites as a contributing factor to bobwhite population dynamics.
We thank those at our study ranch for their continued hospitality and for allowing us ranch access. Thank you to all the Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory (WTL) personnel for their laboratory and field assistance. Finally, we thank the hunters that donate bobwhite to the WTL for their dedication and continued involvement in advancing this research, as well as Park Cities Quail (grant number 24A125) and the Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation (grant number 23A470) for their funding and support.
  1. Elton CS. Animal ecology. University of Chicago Press (1927).
  2. Lack D. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford, the Clarendon Press (1954).
  3. Peterson MJ. “Parasites and infectious diseases of prairie grouse: should managers be concerned?” Wildlife Society Bulletin 32.1 (2004): 35-55.
  4. Anderson RM and May RM. “Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory processes”. Journal of Animal Ecology 47.1 (1978): 219-247.
  5. May RM and Anderson RM. “Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: II. Destabilizing processes”. Journal of Animal Ecology 47.1 (1978): 249-267.
  6. Tompkins DM and Begon M. “Parasites can regulate wildlife populations”. Parasitology Today 15.8 (1999): 311-313.
  7. Hudson PJ., et al.Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal”. Science 282.5397 (1998): 2256-2258.
  8. Gulland FMD. “The impact of infectious diseases on wild animal populations: a review”. In: Grenfell BT and Dobson AP. (eds) Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1995): 20-51.
  9. Watson MJ. “What drives population-level effects of parasites? Meta-analysis meets life-history”. International Journal of Parasitology Parasites and Wildlife 2 (2013): 190-196.
  10. McCallum H. “Host-pathogen and host-parasite models”. In: Lawton JH and Likens GE (eds) Population parameters: estimation for ecological models. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd (2000): 284-312.
  11. Friend M., et al. Disease emergence in birds: challenges for the twenty-first century”. Auk 118.2 (2001): 290-303.
  12. Wilber MQ., et al.Detecting and quantifying parasite-induced host mortality from intensity data: Method comparisons and limitations”. International Journal of Parasitology 46.1 (2016): 59-66.
  13. Rollins D. Quails on the Rolling Plains. In: Brennan LA (Ed) Texas quails: ecology and management. College Station, Texas, Texas A&M University Press (2007): 117-141.
  14. Guthery FS. Beef, brush and bobwhites: quail management in Cattle County. Kingsville, Texas, Ceasar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute (1986).
  15. Brennan LA. Texas quails: ecology and management. College Station, Texas, Texas A&M University Press (2007).
  16. Sauer JR., et al.The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966-2011: summary analysis and species accounts”. North American Fauna 79 (2013): 1-32.
  17. Bruno A. “Survey for Trichomonas gallinae and assessment of helminth parasites in northern bobwhites from the Rolling Plains ecoregion”. Thesis, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (2014).
  18. Dunham NR., et al.Eyeworms (Oxyspirura petrowi) in northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) from the rolling plains ecoregion of Texas and Oklahoma, 2011-13”. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52.3 (2016): 562-567.
  19. Jackson AS and Green H. Dynamics of bobwhite quail in the west Texas Rolling Plains: parasitism in bobwhite quail. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Federal Aid Project No. W-88-R-4, Austin, Texas (1965).
  20. Dunham NR., et al. Evidence of an Oxyspirura petrowi epizootic in northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus), Texas, USA”. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 50.3 (2014): 552-558.
  21. Bruno A., et al.Pathological response of northern bobwhites to Oxyspirura petrowi infections”. Journal of Parasitology 101.3 (2015): 364-368.
  22. Dunham NR., et al.Oxyspirura petrowi infection leads to pathological consequences in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus)”. International Journal of Parasitology Parasites and Wildlife 5.3 (2016): 273-276.
  23. Lehmann VW. Bobwhites in the Rio Grande plain of Texas. College Station, Texas, Texas A&M University Press (1984).
  24. Henry C., et al. “Oxyspirura petrowi and Aulonocephalus pennula infection in wild northern bobwhite quail in the Rolling Plains ecoregion, Texas: possible evidence of a die-off”. Archives of Parasitology 1.2 (2017): 1-4.
  25. Brym MZ., et al. “Elevated parasite burdens as a potential mechanism affecting northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) population dynamics in the Rolling Plains of West Texas”. Parasitology Research 117.6 (2018): 1683-1688.
  26. Brym MZ., et al.Potential parasite induced host mortality in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains ecoregion of West Texas”. Archives of Parasitology 2.115 (2018): 1-3.
  27. Dunham NR., et al. “Infection levels of the eyeworm Oxyspirura petrowi and caecal worm Aulonocephalus pennula in the northern bobwhite and scaled quail from the Rolling Plains of Texas”. Journal of Helminthology 91.5 (2017): 569-577.
  28. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in the Rolling Plains: Quail Forecast 2017-2018.
  29. Gulland FMD. “The role of nematode parasites in Soay sheep (Ovis aries L.) mortality during a population crash”. Parasitology 105.3 (1992): 493-503.
  30. Hudson PJ., et al.Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation? Red grouse and parasites”. Journal of Animal Ecology 61.3 (1992): 681-692.
  31. Jackson AS. Quail management handbook for West Texas Rolling Plains. Bulletin Number 48. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas (1969).
  32. De Rosa M and Shivaprasad HL. “Capillariasis in a vulture guinea fowl”. Avian Diseases 43.1 (1999): 131-135.
  33. Nagarajan K., et al. “Subulura brumpti infection - an outbreak in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica)”. Veterinary Research Forum 3.1 (2012): 67-69.
  34. McSorley HJ and Maizels RM. “Helminth infections and host immune regulation”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 25.4 (2012): 85-608.
  35. Harvell CD., et al.Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota”. Science 296.5576 (2002): 2158-2162.
  36. Altizer S., et al.Climate change and infectious diseases: from evidence to a predictive framework”. Science 341.6145 (2013): 514-519.
  37. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Temperature and Precipitation Maps.
  38. Bale JS., et al.Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores”. Global Change Biology 8.1 (2002): 1-16.
  39. Kistler WM., et al.Plains lubber grasshopper (Brachystola magna) as a potential intermediate host for Oxyspirura petrowi in northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus)”. Parasitology Open 2.7 (2016): 1-8.
  40. Henry C., et al. Molecular identification of potential intermediate hosts of Aulonocephalus pennula from the order Orthoptera”. Journal of Helminthology (2018): 1-6.
  41. Almas S., et al. “Molecular detection of Oxyspirura larvae in arthropod intermediate hosts”. Parasitology Research 117.3 (2018): 819-823.
  42. Capinera JL., et al. Field guide to grasshoppers, katydids, and crickets of the United States”. Ithaca, Cornell University Press (2004).
  43. Peterson MJ. Diseases and parasites of Texas quails. In: Brennan LA (Ed) Texas quails: ecology and management. College Station, Texas, Texas A&M University Press (2007): 89-114.
  44. Lafferty K D and Kuris A M. “How environmental stress affects the impacts of parasites”. Limnology and Oceanography 44.3.2 (1999): 925-931.
Citation: Ronald J Kendall., et al. “Are Helminths Contributing to the Population Fluctuations of Northern Bobwhite Quail (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of West Texas?” Multidisciplinary Advances in Veterinary Science 2.5 (2018): 406-412.
Copyright: © 2018 Ronald J Kendall., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.