Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 3 - 2018
Behavior of Helminthes in Laying Hens During the Period 2014-2017.
Yenisey Garcia Ferrer*, Daisy Rodríguez García and Pastor Simon Milanés
Department of Parasitology of the Laboratory of Avian Research and Diagnosis (LARD), Poultry Research Institute, Havana, Cuba
*Corresponding Author: Yenisey García Ferrer, Department of Parasitology of the Laboratory of Avian Research and Diagnosis (LARD), Poultry Research Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Received: May 25, 2018; Published: May 29, 2018
Abstract
The helminthological infestation of birds useful for man, is favored with the concentration of these in the breeding areas, which together with poor hygienic-sanitary conditions benefits the development and reproduction of them, increasing associated metabolic and physiological disorders that weaken the chicken In the present study, all laying hens referred to the Parasitology Department of LARD during the 2014-2017 period were analyzed, in order to determine the behavior of the helminths that affected them. A total of 3103 samples from different sectors were investigated, incomplete helminthological necropsy was performed and the prevalence and Invasion intensity of the diagnosed parasites was determined. The main helminths found were Raillietina spp., Raillietina cesticillus, with a high prevalence, Raillietina tetragona, Choanotaenia infundibulum, Ascaridia galli, Subulura suctoria, Heterakis gallinarum and Tetrameres americana, the latter being the one with the highest Average Invasion Intensity. Of the polyhelminthiasis detected, the most frequent were the associations of Raillietina cesticillus-Ascaridia galli and Raillietina cesticillus-Heterakis gallinarum with 18 and 19% respectively. The values indicated that the cestode Raillietina cesticillus was the one that most affected the hens in production, causing a severe helminthiasis.
Keywords: Laying hens; Helminthes; Cestode; Nematode
Introduction
The current Cuban poultry farming is based on the exploitation of commercial hybrids specialized in the production of eggs with high-capacity laying hens. Egg production has reached a high level of specialization, especially under conditions of controlled environments and balanced feeding; however, under hot-humid conditions, without adequate control of environmental variables and less efficient feeding systems, the results may be affected, so it is of great interest to monitor the main causes that affect the functioning of a productive system (López., et al. 2004, Fernandez and Pérez 2008).
The poultry industry is one of the most important sectors in the livestock activity in Cuba, so it is vital to update the state of health of the country and its regions, design efficient programs to reduce health risks that may affect the economy in the short term and long term. And the stability of the companies dedicated to this purpose (Albizures., et al. 2016). Gastrointestinal parasitism is one of the main problems that affect the performance of these birds, causing morbidity and mortality, which negatively affects the production rates and, therefore, the economic aspect of the producers. Gastrointestinal parasitosis caused by helminth affects the health of birds by reducing the production of meat and eggs, causing economic losses annually for the poultry sector and reducing the availability of products for human consumption (Ensuncho., et al. 2015; Albizures., et al. 2016).
The control of parasitic diseases depends on the precise and timely diagnosis of the etiological agents, in order to establish the correct and effective treatment that allows to improve the profitability of the productive unit. Based on this, the objective of the work is to determine the behavior of helminths diagnosed in laying hens during the 2014-2017 period.
Materials and Methods
In the present study, all laying hens referred to the Department of Parasitology of the Laboratory of Avian Research and Diagnostics (LIDA), belonging to the Poultry Research Institute (AVIS), were analyzed during the period 2014-2017, in order to determine the main helminths that affected them.
We investigated 3103 chickens from various sectors such as state, national plan, genetics and particular. For the study of the helminths, an incomplete helminth necropsy was performed as established by Rodríguez., et al. (2002) where the intestines and blind were inspected and consisted essentially of the scraping of the intestinal mucosa, dilution and decantation of the contents. The proventriculus and gizzard of birds with suspected nematodes in these organs were also analyzed.
The prevalence and Average Invasion Intensity of each parasite diagnosed was determined by the formula proposed by Roque (2015):
Prevalence = Number of positive samples/Number of samples worked *100
Average Invasion Intensity (A.I.I.) = Amount of parasites/Number of positive birds
For the calculation and interpretation of the results, it was based on the four categories, according to the degree of pathogenicity of the helminths (Rodríguez., et al. 2002):
  • Negative: when parasitic forms or their larvae do not appear.
  • Mild: little and moderately pathogenic species, the product of prevalence by A.I.I. is equal to or less than 125. Pathogenic species, the product of prevalence by A.I.I. isequaltoorlessthan25.
  • Average: low and medium pathogenic species, the product prevalence by A.I.I. is greater than 125 and less than or equal to 225. Pathogenic species, the product prevalence by A.I.I. is greater than 25 and less than or equal to 50.
  • Severe: low and medium pathogenic species, the product prevalence by A.I.I. is greater than 225. Pathogenic species, the product prevalence by A.I.I. is greater than 50.
Statistical Analysis: The analysis of comparison of proportions to prevalence values ​​was carried out, with the support of the statistical package COMPROP1.
Results and Discussion
In table 1 it can be seen that in the different years the same helminths were presented, except for the year 2014 where Raillietina spp. and 2016 where Raillietina tetragona and Tetrameres americana were diagnosed. However, although they did not appear throughout the period, these parasites are very frequent, coinciding with Pardo (2007) who states that Tetrameres americana is present in numerous avian troops and with Sanchez (2004) when referring that within the cestodes that affect the most frequent birds are Railletina spp., being known Railletina cesticilus, tetragona and echinobotrida as the most frequent in the domestic chicken that is the definitive host.
Year Worked samples Positive samples Helminth diagnosed
2014 272 1 Raillietina spp.
37 Raillietina cesticillus
33 Choanotaenia infundibulum
4 Ascaridia galli
7 Subulura suctoria
34 Heterakis gallinarum
2015 858 139 Raillietina cesticillus
29 Choanotaenia infundibulum
39 Ascaridia galli
67 Subulura suctoria
47 Heterakis gallinarum
2016 889 196 Raillietina cesticillus
2 Raillietina tetragona
21 Choanotaenia infundibulum
34 Ascaridia galli
21 Subulura suctoria
45 Heterakis gallinarum
3 Tetrameres americana
2017 1084 237 Raillietina cesticillus
106 Choanotaenia infundibulum
20 Ascaridia galli
5 Subulura suctoria
43 Heterakis gallinarum
Total 3103 1170 -
Table 1: Diagnostic helminths in laying hens during the period 2014-2017.
According to Corredor., et al. (2006) differences in resistance to parasitic infection have been demonstrated among some breeds of chickens, where light breeds such as White Leghorn and White Menorca are more sensitive than       heavy                 breeds.
These parasites especially affect young birds and in laying period due to the expoliation effect, which decreases the rate of growth and production levels and eventually causes death (López., et al. 2004).
Table 2 reflects the behavior of the prevalence of diagnosed helminths. The results reveal that the cestode Raillietina cesticillus with a 19.63% prevalence is the most frequent and Raillietina spp. together with Raillietina tetragona and Tetrameres americana those of lower prevalence. In research conducted by Colas., et al. (2010) showed that in laying hens the cestode Raillietina cesticillus was found in greater proportion. These results coincide with studies conducted by Hernández., et al. (2004) and Colas., et al. (2006) highlighting that this helminth was the most frequent in domestic chickens in commercial breeding in Cuba and in laying hens, however Albizures., et al. (2016) report that research conducted in Central America has resulted in the nematode Ascaridia galli being the helminth with the highest incidence.
Helminth species Positive birds Prop. Prev. (%)
Raillietina spp. 1 0,0003 0,03d
Raillietina cesticillus 609 0,1963 19,63a
Raillietina tetragona 2 0,0006 0,06d
Choanotaenia infundibulum 189 0,0609 6,09b
Tetrameres americana 3 0,0009 0,09d
Ascaridia galli 97 0,0313 3,13c
Subulura suctoria 100 0,0322 3,22c
Heterakis gallinarum 169 0,0545 5,45b
Total birds analyzed 3103
Table 2: Behavior of the prevalence of helminths diagnosed in laying hens in the period 2014-2017.
In studies conducted by Ensuncho., et al. (2015) in Colombia obtained that within the helminths, the nematode of the genus Capillaria spp. was the most frequent, followed by Ascaridia galli, Heterakis gallinarum and Syngamus trachea. Among the group of custodies, the most frequent were the genus Railletina spp. and Davainea proglottina. These results are similar to those found by Marín and Benavides (2007) in the department of Caldas, Colombia, where they found Heterakis gallinarum, Ascaridia galli and Capillaria spp. among the most frequent genera of nematodes. Unlike our study, nematodes were not relevant and positive results were not obtained for Capillaria spp., Syngamus trachea and Davainea proglottina.
The helminths diagnosed in these birds were manifested with a higher Intensity of Invasion for American Tetrameres followed by Heterakis gallinarum and Subulura suctoria (Table 3). While the Tetrameres Americana proventricle nematode is moderately pathogenic, the nematodes of the blind Heterakis gallinarum and Subulura suctoria are low pathogens, according to the degree of pathogenicity for Cuba, considered by Rodríguez., et al. (2002), so that so the injuries do not go from a simple irritation and thickening of the mucous membranes.
Helminth species Total parasites Positive Birds AII.
Raillietina spp. 2 1 2
Raillietina cesticillus 3433 609 5,64
Raillietina tetragona 9 2 4,50
Choanotaenia infundibulum 793 189 4,19
Tetrameres americana 49 3 16,33
Ascaridia galli 1037 97 10,69
Subulura suctoria 1181 100 11,81
Heterakis gallinarum 2196 169 12,99
Table 3: Average Invasion Intensity Behavior of the helminths diagnosed in laying hens in the period 2014-2017.
Despite the results obtained, it is important to highlight the hematophagous power of the Tetrameres Americana females, coinciding with Pardo (2007), by stating that the females parasitize the proventriculus glands causing atrophy and strong gastritis. The expoliation reaction (hematophagous) is direct on the bird's organism, causing inflammatory reactions with diminution of the physiological activity of the proventriculus. It also highlights the nematode Heterakis gallinarum that its importance lies in that it is an intermediary host of the protozoan Histomona meliagridis which, although it does not constitute a great danger to the domestic chicken, if it represents it for turkeys.
Table 4 reveals the levels of infestation of the helminths diagnosed, highlighting the Cestode Raillietina cesticillus that causes a severe helminthiasis and Choanotaenia infundibulum and Ascaridia galli with media levels. These helminths are considered very pathogenic, so they cause damage to the bird's organism, affecting its performance and indicating the need for the application of a treatment. The results coincide with Martín-Gómez and Benavides-Montaño (2007) who state that birds with high helminth loads show decay, wasting, diarrhea, reduced food efficiency and in severe cases, death. On the other hand, Junquera (2018) reports that studies carried out in several countries have reported that more than 90% of the hens investigated were infected with Ascaridia galli, that their high intensity causes intestinal obstruction and in layers the infection can cause loss of performance and discolored buds, however Corridor., et al. (2006) state that for Ascaridia galli, the age of the host and its diet play a very important role in the development of the disease, where chickens under three months of age are much more receptive to parasitism and disease It is much more serious. The results showed Raillietina cesticillus as the most present helminth.
Level of infestation
Mild Half Serious
Raillietina spp. Choanotaenia infundibulum Raillietina cesticillus
Raillietina tetragona
Subulura suctoria Ascaridia galli
Heterakis gallinarum
Tetrameres americana
Table 4: Level of Infestation of the helminths diagnosed in laying hens in the period 2014-2017.
Comparison of proportions: Test F = 9.52*** (ES = 0.02)
(Different letters in the same column differ with high significance for p-value < 0.001)
Figure 1: Behavior of the prevalence of polyhelminthiasis diagnosed in laying hens in the period 2014-2017.
Figure 1 shows the behavior of the polyhelminthiases diagnosed in these birds, where it is revealed that the associations Raillietina cesticillus-Heterakis gallinarum and Raillietina cesticillus-Ascaridia galli are the most prevalent, showing very significant differences with respect to the other combinations. The association Raillietina cesticillus-Ascaridia galli is of great importance in poultry farming because both are considered highly pathogenic, so their combination causes alterations in the organism of these birds and can cause death if not treated in time.
This study shows that monoparasitism occurred in 87.44%, whereas multiple infections (12.56%) occurred with up to two and three taxa. As stated by Ensuncho., et al. (2015) birds can be infected through food, water and soil (in search of invertebrates who can act as intermediate or paratenic hosts of various kinds of helminths). Lizaso (2014) considers that spring and summer are the times of greatest abundance of helminths, mainly due to the greater presence of intermediate hosts.
A few parasites do not cause serious damage, however, if there are massive invasions, the effects on the host increase. In laying birds, there is a decrease in the rate of laying on the affected farms, coinciding with Pardo (2007). On the other hand, Lizaso (2014) considers that, in laying hens, one of the first symptoms that appear after a helminth infestation is the increase in the number of declassified eggs, mainly of pale eggs.
In research carried out on fighting cocks in Venezuela Cazorla and Morales (2013), they found that 37.3% of the birds presented one or more helminth taxa in their digestive tracts. Monoparasitism occurred in 8.8% of cases, while multiple infections occurred with up to six taxa. In his studies the ascaris Heterakis spp. and Ascaridia galli were the most frequent, while our results showed Raillietina cesticillus in this place.
Conclusions
  • The helminths diagnosed in laying hens during the period 2014-2017 were the cestodes Raillietina spp., Raillietina cesticillus, Raillietina tetragona, Choanotaenia infundibulum and the nematodes Tetrameres americana, Ascaridia galli, Subulura suctoria and Heterakis gallinarum.
  • The most prevalent helminth was the Cestode Raillietina cesticillus, causing a severe helminthiasis.
  • The highest Average Invasion Intensity was presented for the Tetrameres Americana nematode.
  • The most prevalent polyhelminthiases were the Raillietina cesticillus-Heterakis gallinarum and Raillietina cesticillus-Ascaridia galli associations.
Comparison of proportions: Test F = 290.59*** (ES = 0.00)
(Different letters in the same column differ with high significance for p-value < 0.001)
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest
References
  1. Albizures A., et al. “Determinación de la prevalencia de ectoparásitos y helmintos gastrointestinales en aves de granjas en los departamentos de San Marcos, Retalhuleu, Suchitepéquez, Escuintla, Santa Rosa y Lutiapa”. Guatemala: Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala (2016): 67-68.
  2. Cazorla D and Morales P. “Prevalencia de parásitos intestinales en gallos de pelea de la ciudad de Coro, estado Falcón, Venezuela”. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú 24.4 (2013): 5-7.
  3. Colas M., et al. “Detección de especies de helmintos y ectoparásitos en aves ponedoras con diagnóstico de síndrome respiratorio crónico”. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Avícola 34.2 (2010): 7.
  4. Colas M., et al. “Principales enfermedades diagnosticadas en gallinas ponedoras en el año 2005”. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Avícola 30.2 (2006): 103-107.
  5. Corredor C., et al. Enfermedades parasitarias de las aves [en línea]. Colombia; 24 noviembre 2006.
  6. Ensuncho C., et al. “Frecuencia de parásitos gastrointestinales en gallinas criollas (Gallus domesticus) en el departamento de Córdoba, Colombia”. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria 16.6 (2015): 5-7.      
  7. Fernández E and Pérez E. “Análisis en sistema de una granja de ponedoras comerciales. Aplicación de un modelo que vincula problemas, causas y posibles soluciones”. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Avícola 32.2 (2008): 29.
  8. Hernández M., et al. “Parásitos internos de la gallina doméstica en las crianzas comerciales de Cuba”. Memoria IV Congreso de Avicultura (2004).
  9. Junquera P. Ascaridia spp., gusanos nematodos parásitos de aves (gallinas, pavos, faisanes etc.) [en línea]. México; 03 enero 2018.
  10. Lizaso D. Parásitos en sistemas alternativos de producción de huevos [en línea]. España; 22 diciembre 2014.
  11. López A, García M, Sánchez A. La industria avícola. En: Sánchez A, López A, Sardá R, Pérez M, Trujillo E, García M, Lamazares M. Salud y producción de las aves. La Habana, Cuba: Universidad Agraria de La Habana (UNAH) (2004): 1.
  12. Martín-Gómez S and Benavides-Montaño J. “Parásitos en aves domésticas (Gallus domesticus) en el Noroccidente de Colombia”. Vet. Zootec 1.2 (2007): 44-48.
  13. Pardo E. “Parasitología Veterinaria II”. Managua, Nicaragua: Universidad Nacional Agraria (UNA) (2007): 60-62.
  14. Rodríguez DJ., et al. “Métodos para el trabajo con los helmintos más importantes en Medicina Veterinaria”. Colección Salud Animal EDICENSA 4 (2002): 67.
  15. Roque E. “Parasitología y enfermedades parasitarias en los animales domésticos”. La Habana: Félix Varela 8 (2015): 311-312.
Citation: Yenisey García Ferrer., et al. “Behavior of Helminthes in Laying Hens During the Period 2014-2017.” Multidisciplinary Advances in Veterinary Science 2.3 (2018): 341-347.
Copyright: © 2018 Yenisey García Ferrer., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.