Case Report
Volume 2 Issue 1 - 2018
İsolated Foveal Hypoplasia
Feyza Çalış Karanfil*
Yüksek Ihtisas University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology , Ankara 06520, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Feyza Çalış Karanfil, Yüksek Ihtisas University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology , Ankara 06520, Turkey.
Received: February 19, 2018; Published: April 13, 2018
Foveal hypoplasia (FH) is characterized by the lack of foveal depression and persistence of all neurosensory retinal layers in the supposed foveal region [1-3]. Foveal hypoplasia may be associated with albinism, microphthalmia, aniridia, achromatosis, and retinopathy of prematurity [4]. The disease can also be seen as an isolated form rarely [5]. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a quick and useful technique to make the suspected diagnosis and grading of the disease [1,3]. In this report, we present a case of foveal hypoplasia who had a preserved vision and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed to make the diagnosis and explain the structural characteristics.
Case Report
A 49-year-old female patient applied to our clinic for the routine eye examination, without any complaints. She did not have any systemic diseases except for Diabetes mellitus. The full ophthalmic examination was performed. Her visual acuity was 9/10 in both eyes. Refractive errors were -0,50 and 2,50-0,50 axe160 and intraocular pressures were 18 and 17 mmHg in the right and left eyes respectively. Bio-microscopic anterior segment examination was normal; she did not have aniridia, cataract or translumination defect. Bilateral foveal reflexes were absent but retinal pigmentation was normal on fundus examination. She did not have nystagmus and strabismus. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue-100 OCT, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA) was performed and multiple retinal sections were obtained from the foveal region. In the OCT scans foveal pits are absent, inner retinal layers were continued in the fovea-like extra foveal region and the whole retina was thickened in both eyes central foveal thicknesses were 282 and 300 μm in right and left eyes respectively. Subfoveal choroidal thicknesses are 247 and 251 μm in right and left eyes respectively. The external limiting membrane and IS/OS bands were intact in both eyes. With these findings, the patient was diagnosed with isolated foveal hypoplasia.
In FH there is a wide variability of clinical manifestations such as fundal aspect and visual acuities but there is a common finding for all cases, that is SD-OCT pattern with reduced or absent foveal pit and continuity of inner retinal layers [1-3].
Fundus appearance may vary from unremarkable except for absent of foveal reflexes to slightly mottled pigment disorganizations in foveal hypoplasia [2], as we found the first one in our case. In recent years, studies have shown that OCT can be used as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for foveal hypoplasia [1,4,6]. Various OCT findings may be encountered in foveal hypoplasia cases. These findings are the shallow or absent foveal pit, increased outer nuclear layer width, increased photoreceptor outer segment length, and thickening of the whole retina [1-3, 8-10]. Foveal hypoplasia is graded by optical coherence tomography according to the presence or absence of findings such as extrusion of plexiform layers in the fovea, the absence of foveal pit, the extension of photoreceptor outer segment, and expansion of outer nuclear layer. 5 grades are defined [4,11]:
Grade 1: There are shallow foveal depression; photoreceptor outer segment prolongation and outer nuclear layer expansion but no extrusion of plexiform layers.
Grade 2: There are photoreceptor outer segment prolongation and outer nuclear layer expansion but no extrusion of plexiform layers and foveal depression.
Grade 3: There is outer nuclear layer expansion but no extrusion of plexiform layers, foveal depression, and photoreceptor outer segment prolongation.
Grade 4: There are no extrusion of plexiform layers, foveal depression, photoreceptor outer segment prolongation and outer nuclear layer expansion.
Atypical: There is shallow foveal depression, but no extrusion of plexiform layers. The IS/OS band is degraded and interrupted.
In our case, we confirmed the diagnosis by OCT and graded by this classification system as grade 2. It was reported that foveal hypoplasia is associated with a broad range of visual acuities from 20/20 to 20/400 in the literature [7]. In our case, visual acuity was 9/10 in both eyes. OCT may also be useful for giving an idea about the estimated visual acuity. Some of the ophthalmologists tried to figure out a relationship between visual acuity and foveal morphology, but the foveal pit was not accepted as a prognostic factor [7]. The foveal avascular zone and the pit are not critical for the postnatal lengthening of cones or spatial packing which have a role to make the higher visual resolution. Although foveal cone specialization may be protected anatomically and functionally during the absence of a foveal depression. Fovea plana is a term recently suggested to define only the anatomic absence of a foveal pit with no functional effects [7,12]. This explains why some patients may have good visual acuity despite the absence of normal foveal depression, as found in our patient. The grading system was based on the stage at which foveal development was stopped and may be helpful to provide a prognostic indicator for visual acuity [11]. The normal thickness of the photoreceptor layer found in our patient at the presumed foveal center is also present in healthy eyes [2]. This may be a sign of lesser anatomic alteration in a subgroup of patients with foveal hypoplasia and may be the explanation of the preserved visual acuity in these patients.
In our patient, there were no signs of associated features such as regressed ROP, myopia, cataract, corneal pannus, ocular albinism or incontinent pigments which were reported previously. For this reason, our case diagnosed as an isolated form of foveal hypoplasia. This is a rare form of the disease. This report highlights the role of OCT in the diagnosis of this condition, by the demonstration of the preservation of the inner retinal layers in the fovea. SD-OCT is a noninvasive, simple and rapid procedure for the detection of foveal hypoplasia, which can be difficult to detect in the clinical and ophthalmologic examination in cases with unexplained visual decrease. FH must be kept in mind in patients who had a good but not complete visual acuity and OCT must be performed for the diagnosis.
  1. Holmstrom G., et al. “Optical coherence tomography is helpful in the diagnosis of foveal hypoplasia”. Acta Ophthalmologica 88.4 (2010): 439-442.
  2. Issa PC., et al. “Multimodal fundus imaging in foveal hypoplasia: combined scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography”. Archives of Ophthalmology 126.10 (2008): 1463-1465.
  3. Turgut B., et al. “Optik Koherens Tomografide Foveal Hipoplazi: İki Olgu Sunumu”. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 18.4 (2013): 246-248.
  4. Seo JH., et al. “Correlation of visual acuity with foveal hypoplasia grading by optical coherence tomography in albinism”. Ophthalmology 114.8 (2007): 1547-1551.
  5. Querques G., et al. “Isolated foveal hypoplasia'', International Ophthalmology 28.10 (2009): 271-274.
  6. Cronin TH., et al. “Spectral domain optical coherence tomography for detection of foveal morphology in patients with nystagmus”. Journal of AAPOS 13.6 (2009): 563-566.
  7. Marmor M.F., et al. “Visual insignificance of the foveal pit: reassessment of foveal hypoplasia as fovea plana”. Archives of Ophthalmology 126.7 (2008): 907-913.
  8. Mietz H., et al. “Foveal hypoplasia in complete oculocutaneous albinism: a histopathologic study”. Retina 12.3 (1992): 254-260.
  9. Chong GT., et al. “Abnormal foveal morphology in ocular albinism imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography”. Archives of ophthalmology 127.1 (2009): 37-44.
  10. Meyer CH., et al. “Foveal hypoplasia in oculocutaneous albinism demonstrated by optical coherence tomography”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 133.3 (2002): 409-410.
  11. Thomas MG., et al. “Structural grading of foveal hypoplasia using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a predictor of visual acuity?” Ophthalmology 118.8 (2011): 1653-1660.
  12. Vincent A., et al. “Variable expressivity of ocular associations of foveal hypoplasia in a family”. Eye 23.8 (2009): 1735-1739.
Citation: Feyza Çalış Karanfil. “İsolated Foveal Hypoplasia”. Ophthalmology and Vision Science 2.1 (2018): 200-202.
Copyright: © 2018 Feyza Çalış Karanfil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.