Research Article
Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2019
Some Trace Element Contents and Ratios in Prostatic Fluids as Ancillary Diagnostic Tools in Distinguishing Between the Chronic Prostatitis and Prostate Cancer
Vladimir Zaichick1* and Sofia Zaichick2
1Radionuclide Diagnostics Department, Medical Radiological Research Centre, Russia
2Laboratory of Dr. Gabriela Caraveo Piso, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, USA
*Corresponding Author: Vladimir Zaichick, Medical Radiological Research Centre, Korolyev St. 4, Obninsk 249036, Kaluga region, Russia.
Received: May 09, 2019; Published: June 10, 2019
Abstract
Chronic prostatitis and prostate cancer is an internationally important health problem of the man, particularly in developed countries. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate whether significant difference in the levels of some trace elements and their ratios in prostatic fluid exist between the inflamed and malignantly transformed prostate. Prostatic fluid levels of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn as well as Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr ratios were prospectively evaluated in 33 patients with chronic prostatitis and 24 patients with prostate cancer. Measurements were performed using 109Cd radionuclide-induced energy dispersive X-ray fluorescent microanalysis. It was found that the levels of Rb, Zn, Zn/Br, and Zn/Fe were significantly lower (approximately 4, 6, 7, and 12 times, respectively) in fluid of cancerous prostate compared with those in fluid of inflamed prostate. The great decrease in levels of Rb, Zn, Zn/Br, and Zn/Fe in the fluid of cancerous prostate might demonstrate an involvement of these trace elements in etiology and pathogenesis of malignant prostate tumors. It was supposed that the differences in of Rb, Zn, Zn/Br, and Zn/Fe levels in prostatic fluid can be used as tumor markers.
Key Words: Chronic prostatitis; Prostate cancer; Prostatic fluid; Trace element contents; Trace element ratios; Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescent analysis
Abbreviations: PCa, Prostate Cancer; CP, Chronic Prostatitis; PSA, Prostate Specific Antigen; TRUS, Trance Rectal Ultra Sonography; MR, Magnetic Resonance; TE, Trace Elements; EPF, Expressed Prostatic Fluid; EDXRF, Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence; CRM, Certified Reference Materials; IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency.
Introduction
In industrialized countries prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant diseases in men. PCa incidence and mortality rates are among the highest for North America, Oceania, and Northern and Western Europe [1,2]. The American Cancer Society declares PCa as the most common cancer in males and the second leading cause of cancer death [3]. Moreover, PCa is the leading cancer in terms of incidence and mortality in men from Africa and the Caribbean [1]. PCa in China has also become a major public health concern [4].
Prostatitis is the most common urologic disease in adult males younger than 50 years and the third most common urologic diagnosis in males older than 50 years [5]. Chronic prostatitis (CP) is functional, somatoform disorder with a high worldwide prevalence estimated in systematic reviews or population studies at 10-32% [6,7]. However, CP is a more common condition, with 35–50% of men reported to be affected by symptoms suggesting prostatitis during their lifetime [8].
Thus, the both PCa and CP is the very common urologic disease in adult males. Moreover, use systematic review methods provide the statistical evidence that the association between PCa and CP is significant [9]. Prostatitis can be a cause of an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level in blood [10]. In these cases it is difficult to differentiate CP from PCa, because the findings like TRUS and conventional MR Imaging can mimic those of PCa. Even biopsy doesn't play promising role in the diagnosis of CP. As a result of this, CP may be misdiagnosed as a malignant condition and end up in aggressive surgical management resulting in increased morbidity [11]. This warrants the need of reliable diagnostic tool which has ability not only to diagnose CP reliably but also to differentiate it from the PCa.
It was reported that the risk of having PCa and CP depends on lifestyle and diet, including the intake of zinc (Zn) and some other trace elements (TE) [12-16]. TE have essential physiological functions such as maintenance and regulation of cell function, gene regulation, activation or inhibition of enzymatic reactions, and regulation of membrane function. They can play the significant role in the oxidative stress. Essential or toxic (mutagenic, carcinogenic) properties of TE depend on tissue-specific need or tolerance, respectively [17]. Excessive accumulation or a deficit of the TE may disturb the cell functions and may result in cellular degeneration or death [17-21]. Besides only total amounts of TE, ratios of TE should be taken into account on a regular basis to allow for a more reliable description of the individual TE and health status [17,22].
In our previous studies a significant involvement of Zn and some TE in the function of prostate was observed [23-36]. Moreover, it was found that intracellular Zn and calcium (Ca) excess is one of the main factors in the etiology of prostate cancer [13-15,20,21]. One of the main functions of prostate gland is a production of prostatic fluid [37] with extremely high concentration of Zn and some other chemical elements. The first finding of remarkable high level of Zn concentration in human expressed prostatic fluid (EPF) was reported in the beginning of 1960s [38]. Analyzing EPF expressed from prostate of 8 apparently healthy men aged 25-55 years it was found that Zn concentration varied in range from 300 to 730 mg/L. After this finding several investigators have suggested that the measurement of Zn level in EPF may be useful as a marker of prostate secretory function [39,40]. It promoted a more detailed study of Zn concentration in EPF of healthy subjects and in those with different prostate diseases, including PCa [40,41]. A detailed review of these studies, reflecting the contradictions within accumulated data, was given in our earlier publication [41]. Moreover, the method and apparatus for micro analysis of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn in the EPF samples using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) activated by radiation of radionuclide source 109Cd was developed by us [42]
In present study it was supposed by us that apart from Zn the levels of some other TE and ratios Zn/TE contents in EPF have to reflect a difference between functional suppression of chronic inflamed prostate and functional disintegration of cancerous prostate. Thus, this work had four aims. The first aim was to assess the Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentration in the EPF samples obtained from patients with CP and PCa. Using 109Cd EDXRF micro-method. The second aim was to calculate Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, Zn/Sr ratios in all EPF samples. The third aim was to evaluate the quality of obtained results and to compare obtained results with published data. The last aim was to compare the concentration of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn as well as Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, Zn/Sr ratios in EPF samples of chronic inflamed and cancerous prostate gland. All studies were approved by the Ethical Committees of the Medical Radiological Research Centre, Obninsk. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Materials and Methods
Specimens of EPF were obtained from 33 patients with CP (mean age 50 ± 9 years, range 37-65 years) and from 24 patients with PCa (mean age 65 ± 10 years, range 47-77 years) by qualified urologists in the Urological Department of the Medical Radiological Research Centre using standard rectal massage procedure. In all cases the diagnosis has been confirmed by clinical examination and in cases of PCa additionally by morphological results obtained during studies of biopsy and resected materials. Subjects were asked to abstain from sexual intercourse for 3 days preceding the procedure. Specimens of EPF were obtained in sterile containers which were appropriately labeled. Twice twenty μL (microliters) of fluid were taken by micropipette from every specimen for trace element analysis, while the rest of the fluid was used for cytological and bacteriological investigations. The chosen 20 μL of the EPF was dropped on 11.3 mm diameter disk made of thin, ash-free filter papers fixed on the Scotch tape pieces and dried in an exsiccator at room temperature. Then the dried sample was covered with 4 mm Dacron film and centrally pulled onto a Plexiglas cylindrical frame.
To determine concentration of the elements by comparison with a known standard, aliquots of solutions of commercial, chemically pure compounds were used for a device calibration [43]. The standard samples for calibration were prepared in the same way as the samples of prostate fluid. Because there were no available liquid Certified Reference Material (CRM) ten sub-samples of the powdery CRM IAEA H-4 (animal muscle) were analyzed to estimate the precision and accuracy of results. Every CRM sub-sample weighing about 3 mg was applied to the piece of Scotch tape serving as an adhesive fixing backing. An acrylic stencil made in the form of a thin-walled cylinder with 11.3 mm inner diameter was used to apply the sub-sample to the Scotch tape. The polished-end acrylic pestle which is a constituent of the stencil set was used for uniform distribution of the sub-sample within the Scorch surface restricted by stencil inner diameter. When the sub-sample was slightly pressed to the Scotch adhesive sample, the stencil was removed. Then the sub-sample was covered with 4 mm Dacron film. Before the sample was applied, pieces of Scotch tape and Dacron film were weighed using analytical balance. Those were again weighed together with the sample inside to determine the sub-sample mass precisely.
The facility for radionuclide-induced energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence included an annular 109Cd source with an activity of 2.56 GBq, Si(Li) detector with electric cooler and portable multi-channel analyzer combined with a PC. Its resolution was 270 eV at the 6.4 keV line. The facility functioned as follows. Photons with the 22.1 keV energy from 109Cd source are sent to the surface of a specimen analyzed, where they excite the characteristic fluorescence radiation, inducing the Ka X-rays of trace elements. The fluorescence radiation got to the detector through a 10 mm diameter collimator to be recorded.
The duration of the Zn concentration measurement was 10 min. The duration of the Zn concentration measurement together with Br, Fe, Rb, and Sr was 60 min. The intensity of Ka-line of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn for EPF samples and standards was estimated on calculation basis of the total area of the corresponding photopeak in the spectra.
All EPF samples for EDXRF were prepared in duplicate and mean values of TE contents were used in final calculation. Using the Microsoft Office Excel programs, the summary of statistics, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, standard error of mean, minimum and maximum values, median, percentiles with 0.025 and 0.975 levels was calculated for TE concentrations and Zn/TE ratios in EPF of chronic inflamed and cancerous prostate. The difference in the results between two groups of samples (CP and PCa) was evaluated by the parametric Student’s t-test and non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results and Discussion
Table 1 depicts our data for Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn mass fractions in ten sub-samples of CRM IAEA H-4 (animal muscle) and the certified values of this reference material. Of 4 (Br, Fe, Rb, and Zn) TE with certified values for the CRM IAEA H-4 (animal muscle) we determined contents of all certified elements (Table 1). Mean values (M ± SD) for Br, Fe, Rb, and Zn were in the range of 95% confidence interval. Good agreement of the TE contents analyzed by 109Cd radionuclide-induced EDXRF with the certified data of CRM IAEA H-4 (Table 1) indicate an acceptable accuracy of the results obtained in the study of the prostatic fluid presented in Tables 2-4.
Element Certified values This work results
  Mean 95% confidence interval Type Mean ± SD
Br 4.1 3.5 – 4.7 C 5.0 ± 1.2
Fe 49 47 - 51 С 48 ± 9
Rb 18 17 - 20 C 22 ± 4
Sr 0.1 - N <1
Zn 86 83 - 90 C 90 ± 5
Mean – arithmetical mean, SD – standard deviation, C- certified values, N – non-certified values.
Table 1: EDXRF data of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn contents in the IAEA H-4 (animal muscle) reference material compared to certified values (mg/kg, dry mass basis).
Table 2 presents certain statistical parameters (arithmetic mean, standard deviation, standard error of mean, minimal and maximal values, median, percentiles with 0.025 and 0.975 levels) of the Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentrations as well as of the Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, Zn/Sr ratios in EPF of patients with CP and PCa.
Condition of prostate Element or ratio Mean SD SEM Min Max Median Per. 0.025 Per. 0.975
CP Br 3.35 2.64 0.69 0.120 9.85 2.98 0.201 8.73
37-65 years Fe 10.9 9.6 2.3 3.85 41.9 6.97 4.06 35.6
N = 33 Rb 2.32 1.13 0.30 0.730 4.54 1.75 0.935 4.34
  Sr 1.57 1.36 0.79 0.210 2.93 1.58 0.279 2.86
  Zn 382 275 48 62.0 1051 295 75.0 950
  Zn/Br 129 96 32 14.1 322 103 20.2 298
  Zn/Fe 35.9 20.6 5.3 7.03 66.3 33.7 9.12 66.0
  Zn/Rb 175 101 29 41.3 381 154 48.8 367
  Zn/Sr 484 732 422 34.6 1329 88.2 37.3 1267
PCa Br 4.51 7.19 2.27 0.697 24.3 2.08 0.704 20.4
47-77 years Fe 21.7 28.8 8.7 7.70 107 13.9 7.70 86.8
N = 24 Rb 0.53 0.38 0.11 0.013 1.39 0.422 0.024 1.26
  Sr 1.70 2.15 0.76 0.230 6.83 0.872 0.275 5.95
  Zn 62.0 98.3 20.1 2.82 371 21.6 3.43 358
  Zn/Br 18.5 25.7 8.1 0.389 68.3 6.86 0.685 67.0
  Zn/Fe 2.99 4.37 1.32 0.237 13.0 0.766 0.239 12.3
  Zn/Rb 900 2540 733 6.77 8840 23.8 6.86 6844
  Zn/Sr 36.8 54.9 19.2 2.20 163 16.8 2.21 146
M - arithmetic mean, SD – standard deviation, SEM – standard error of mean, Min – inimum value, Max – maximum value, Per. 0.025 – percentile with 0.025 level, Per. 0.975 – percentile with 0.975 level, DL – detection limit.
Table 2: Some basic statistical parameters of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentration (mg/L) and also Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr concentration ratio in prostate fluid of patients with CP and PCa.
The comparison of our results with published data for Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentrations and also for Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, Zn/Sr ratios in EPF of inflamed and cancerous prostate [38-41, 44-47] is shown in Table 3. A number of values for Zn concentrations in EPF were not expressed on a wet mass basis in the cited literature. Therefore, we calculated these values using the published data for water –93.2% [47]. The mean of Zn concentration obtained for CP group of prostate fluid, as shown in Table 3, agrees well with median of means cited by other researches [38-41, 44-47]. The mean of Rb concentration obtained for EPF samples of CP group agrees well with our data reported 38 years ago [40]. No published data referring to Br, Fe, Rb, and Sr concentrations as well as to Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr ratios in EPF samples of patients with CP were found.
Condition of prostate Element or ratio Published data [Reference] This work results
Median of means (n)* Minimum of means M or M ±  SD, (n)** Maximum of means M ±  SD, (n)** M ±  SD
CP Br - - - 3.35±2.64
  Fe - - - 10.9±9.6
  Rb 2.26 (1) 2.26 ± 1.28 (18) [40] 2.26 ± 1.28 (18) [40] 2.32±1.13
  Sr - - - 1.57±1.36
  Zn 222 (7) 88.9 (29) [46] 564 ± 239 (10) [45] 382±275
  Zn/Br - - - 129±96
  Zn/Fe - - - 35.9±20.6
  Zn/Rb - - - 175±101
  Zn/Sr - - - 484±732
PCa Br - - - 4.51 ±  7.19
  Fe - - - 21.7 ±  28.8
  Rb 1.11 (1) 1.11 ± 0.57 (15) [40] . 1.11 ± 0.57 (15) [40] 0.53 ± 0.38
  Sr - - - 1.70 ± 2.15
  Zn 65.4 (6) 34.7 ± 34.6 (13) [41] 722 (3) [46] 62.0 ± 98.3
  Zn/Br - - - 18.5 ± 25.7
  Zn/Fe - - - 2.99 ± 4.37
  Zn/Rb - - - 900 ± 2540
  Zn/Sr - - - 36.8 ± 54.9
M - arithmetic mean, SD – standard deviation, (n)* – number of all references, (n)** - number of samples.
Table 3: Median, minimum and maximum value of means of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentration (mg/L) and also Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr concentration ratio in prostate fluid of patients with CP and PCa according to data from the literature.
In the EPF samples of cancerous prostate our results were comparable with published data for Zn concentrations (Table 3). The mean of Rb concentration obtained for EPF samples of PCa group was some lower than our data reported 38 years ago [40]. No published data referring to Br, Fe, and Sr concentrations to Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr ratios in EPF samples obtained from patients with PCa were found.
The ratios of means and the differences between mean values of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentrations and also Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, Zn/Sr ratios in EPF of patients with CP and PCa are presented in Table 4. From Table 4, it is observed that in EPF samples of PCa group the concentrations of Rb and Zn as well as Zn/Br and Zn/Fe ratios are almost 4, 6, 7, and 12 times, respectively, lower than levels of these trace elements in EPS of patients with CP.
Element or ratio Age groups Ratios
CP PCa Student’s t-test p£ U-test* p PCa to CP
Br 3.35±0.69 4.51 ± 2.27 0.635 >0.05 1.35
Fe 10.9±2.3 21.7 ± 8.7 0.251 >0.05 1.99
Rb 2.32±0.30 0.53 ± 0.11 0.000039 <0.01 0.23
Sr 1.57±1.36 1.70 ± 0.76 0.915 >0.05 1.08
Zn 382±48 62.0 ± 20.1 0.00000023 <0.01 0.16
Zn/Br 129 ± 32 18.5 ± 8.1 0.0089 <0.01 0.14
Zn/Fe 35.9 ± 5.3 2.99 ± 1.32 0.0000199 <0.01 0.083
Zn/Rb 175 ± 29 900 ± 733 0.344 >0.05 5.14
Zn/Sr 484 ± 422 36.8 ± 19.2 0.401 >0.05 0.076
M – arithmetic mean, SEM – standard error of mean, *Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test, bold – significant difference (p≤0.05).
Table 4: Comparison of mean values (M≤SEM) of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentration (mg/L) and also Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr concentration ratio in prostate fluid of patients with CP and PCa.
The range of means of Zn concentration reported in the literature for EPF of untreated inflamed prostate (from 88.9 to 564 mg/L) and cancerous prostate (from 34.7 to 722 mg/L) varies widely (Table 3). This can be explained by a dependence of Zn content on many factors, including age, ethnicity, mass of the gland, presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and others. Not all these factors were strictly controlled in cited studies. Another and, in our opinion, leading cause of interobserver variability was insufficient quality control of results in these studies. In many reported papers EPF samples were dried at high temperature or acid digestion. Sample digestion is a critical step in elemental analysis and due to the risk of contamination and analytes loss contributes to the systematic uncontrolled analysis errors [48-50]. Thus, when using destructive analytical methods it is necessary to control for the losses of TE, for complete acid digestion of the sample, and for the contaminations by TE during sample decomposition, which needs adding some chemicals. It is possible to avoid these not easy procedures using non-destructive methods. Therefore, sample-nondestructive technique like 109Cd radionuclide-induced EDXRF, which was developed and used by us [42,51,52] is good alternatives for TE determination in EPF samples.
The 109Cd radionuclide-induced EDXRF developed to determine TE concentrations in prostate fluid is micro method because sample volume 20 μL (one drop) is quite enough for analysis. It is another advantage of the method. Amount of human prostatic fluid collected by massage of the normal prostate is usually in range 100-500 μL [53] but in a pathological state of gland, particularly after malignant transformation, this amount may be significantly lower. Therefore, the micro method of 109Cd radionuclide-induced EDXRF developed to determine TE concentrations in prostate fluid is available for using in clinical studies.
Characteristically, elevated or deficient levels of TE and electrolytes observed in EPF of cancerous prostate are discussed in terms of their potential role in the initiation, promotion, or inhibition of prostate cancer. In our opinion, abnormal levels of TE and Zn/TE ratios in EPF of cancerous prostate could be the consequence of malignant transformation. Compared to other fluids of human body, the prostate secretion has higher levels of Rb and Zn and some other TE. These data suggests that these elements could be involved in functional features of prostate. Chronic inflammation can slightly suppress prostatic function, while malignant transformation is accompanied by a loss of tissue-specific functional features, which leads to a significant reduction in the contents of elements associated with functional characteristics of the human EPF (Rb and Zn).
Our findings show that concentration of Rb and Zn as well as Zn/Br and Zn/Fe ratios are significantly lower in EPF of cancerous prostate as compared to these parameters in EPF of inflamed prostate (Table 4). Thus, it is plausible to assume that levels of Rb and Zn concentration as well as Zn/Br and Zn/Fe ratios in EPF can be used as tumor markers. However, this subjects needs in additional studies.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, analytical techniques employed in this study measure only five TE (Br, Fe, Rb, Sr and Zn) concentrations in EPF. Future studies should be directed toward using other analytical methods which will extend the list of TE investigated in EPF of inflamed and cancerous prostate. Secondly, the sample size of PCa group was relatively small. It was not allow us to carry out the investigations of TE contents and ratios in PCa group using differentials like histological types of tumors, stage of disease, and dietary habits of healthy persons and patients with PCa. Despite these limitations, this study provides evidence on cancer-specific alteration of some TE concentration and their ratios in EPF and shows the necessity the need to continue TE research of EPF in prostatic diseases
Conclusion
In this work, TE measurements were carried out in the EPF samples of inflamed and malignant prostate using non-destructive instrumental EDXRF micro method developed by us. It was shown that this method is an adequate analytical tool for the non-destructive determination of Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn concentration as well as for calculation of Zn/Br, Zn/Fe, Zn/Rb, and Zn/Sr ratios in the EPF samples of human prostate. It was observed that in the EPF of cancerous prostate contents of Rb and Zn as well as Zn/Br and Zn/Fe ratios are significantly lower in a comparison with those in the EPF of inflamed prostate. In our opinion, the decrease in levels of Rb and Zn in the EPF of cancerous prostate might demonstrate an involvement of these TE in etiology and pathogenesis of malignant prostate tumors. It was supposed that the changes of Rb, Zn, Zn/Br, and Zn/Fe levels in the EPF samples can be used as tumor markers.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Sviridova T., Medical Radiological Research Center, Obninsk for supplying EPF samples.
Conflict of interest
There is no any financial interest or any conflict of interest.
References
  1. Rebbeck TR and Haas GP. “Temporal trends and racial disparities in global prostate cancer prevalence”. Canadian Journal of Urology 21 (2014): 7496-7506.
  2. Taitt HE. “Global trends and prostate cancer: A review of incidence, detection, and mortality as influenced by race, ethnicity, and geographic location”. American Journal of Men's Health 12.6 (2018): 1807-1823.
  3. Siegel RL., et al. “Cancer Statistics, 2017”. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 67.1 (2017): 7-30.
  4. Qi D., et al. “Trends of prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Shanghai, China from 1973 to 2009”. Prostate 75 (2015): 1662-1668.
  5. Paulis G. “Inflammatory mechanisms and oxidative stress in prostatitis: the possible role of antioxidant therapy”. Research and Reports in Urology 10 (2018): 75-87.
  6. Propert KJ., et al. “Chronic prostatitis collaborative research network (CPCRN). Responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)”. Quality of Life Research 15 (2006): 299-305.
  7. Ihsan AU., et al. “Role of oxidative stress in pathology of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and male infertility and antioxidants function in ameliorating oxidative stress”. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 106 (2018): 714-723.
  8. Krieger JN., et al. “Epidemiology of prostatitis”. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 31(Suppl. 1) (2008): S85-S90.
  9. Jiang J., et al. “The role of prostatitis in prostate cancer: meta-analysis”. PLoS One 8.12 (2013): e85179.
  10. Nagel KNA., et al. “Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T”. Radiology 267.1 (2013): 164-172.
  11. Sah VK., et al. “Multiparametric MR imaging in diagnosis of chronic prostatitis and its differentiation from prostate cancer”. Radiology of Infectious Diseases 1.2 (2015): 70-77.
  12. Aslam R S. “Dairy foods, milk, calcium, and risk of prostate cancer”. Oncology Nutrition Connection 21.1 (2013): 1, and Neubauer 3-10.
  13. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Dietary intake of minerals and prostate cancer: insights into problem based on the chemical element contents in the prostate gland”. Journal of Aging Research and Clinical Practice 4.3 (2015): 164-171.
  14. Zaichick V., et al. “Intracellular zinc excess as one of the main factors in the etiology of prostate cancer”. Journal of Analytical Oncology 5.3 (2016): 124-131.
  15. Zaichick V., et al. “Intracellular calcium excess as one of the main factors in the etiology of prostate cancer”. AIMS Molecular Science 3.4 (2016): 635-647.
  16. Chen X., et al. “Association of diet and lifestyle with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and pain severity: a case-control study”. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Diseases 19.1 (2016): 92-99.
  17. Zaichick V. “Medical elementology as a new scientific discipline”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 269 (2006): 303-309.
  18. Ektessabi A., et al. “Distribution and chemical states of iron and chromium released from orthopedic implants into human tissues”. X-Ray Spectrometry 30 (2001): 44-48.
  19. Isaacs JT. “Prostatic structure and function in relation to the etiology of prostatic cancer”. Prostate 4.4 (1983): 351-366.
  20. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Role of zinc in prostate cancerogenesis”. In: Anke M, et al., editors. Mengen und Spurenelemente, 19 Arbeitstagung. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (1999): 104-115
  21. Zaichick V. “INAA and EDXRF applications in the age dynamics assessment of Zn content and distribution in the normal human prostate”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 262 (2004): 229-234.
  22. Bornhorst J., et al. “The crux of inept biomarkers for risks and benefits of trace elements”. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 104 (2018): 183-190.
  23. Zaichick S and Zaichick V. “INAA application in the age dynamics assessment of Br, Ca, Cl, K, Mg, Mn, and Na content in the normal human prostate”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 288.1 (2011): 197-202.
  24. Zaichick V., et al. “The effect of age on 12 chemical element contents in intact prostate of adult men investigated by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry”. Biological Trace Element Research 147.1-3 (2012): 49-58.
  25. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Age-related histological and zinc content changes in adult nonhyperplastic prostate glands”. Age 36.1 (2014): 167-181.
  26. Zaichick S and Zaichick V. “The effect of age on Ag, Co, Cr, Fe, Hg, Sb, Sc, Se, and Zn contents in intact human prostate investigated by neutron activation analysis”. Applied Radiatiation and Isotopes 69.6 (2011): 827-833.
  27. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “The effect of age on Br, Ca, Cl, K, Mg, Mn, and Na mass fraction in pediatric and young adult prostate glands investigated by neutron activation analysis”. Applied Radiatiation and Isotopes 82 (2013): 145-151.
  28. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “INAA application in the assessment of Ag, Co, Cr, Fe, Hg, Rb, Sb, Sc, Se, and Zn mass fraction in pediatric and young adult prostate glands”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 298.3 (2013): 1559-1566.
  29. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “NAA-SLR and ICP-AES Application in the assessment of mass fraction of 19 chemical elements in pediatric and young adult prostate glands”. Biological Trace Element Research 156.1 (2013): 357-366.
  30. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Use of neutron activation analysis and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the determination of trace elements in pediatric and young adult prostate”. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry 4 (2013): 696-706.
  31. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “INAA application in the assessment of chemical element mass fractions in adult and geriatric prostate glands”. Applied Radiatiation and Isotopes 90 (2014): 62-73.
  32. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Determination of trace elements in adults and geriatric prostate combining neutron activation with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry”. Open Journal of Biochemistry 1.2 (2014): 16-33.
  33. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Use of INAA and ICP-MS for the assessment of trace element mass fractions in adult and geriatric prostate”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 301.2 (2014): 383-397.
  34. Zaichick V. “The variation with age of 67 macro- and microelement contents in nonhyperplastic prostate glands of adult and elderly males investigated by nuclear analytical and related methods”. Biological Trace Element Research 168.1 (2015): 44-60.
  35. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Androgen-dependent chemical elements of prostate gland”. Andrology and Gynecology: Current Research 2 (2014): 2.
  36. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “Differences and relationships between morphometric parameters and zinc content in nonhyperplastic and hyperplastic prostate glands”. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research 8.8 (2015): 692-706.
  37. Zaichick V. “The prostatic urethra as a Venturi effect urine-jet pump to drain prostatic fluid”. Medical Hypotheses 83 (2014): 65-68.
  38. Mackenzie AR., et al. “Zinc content of expressed human prostate fluid”. Nature (London) 193.4810 (1962): 72-73.
  39. Marmar JL, et al. “Values for zinc in whole semen, fraction of split ejaculate and expressed prostatic fluid”. Urology 16.5 (1980): 478-480.
  40. Zaichick V., et al. “Method for diagnostics of prostate diseases”. Certificate of invention No 997281 (30.03.1981), Russia.
  41. Zaichick V., et al. “Zinc concentration in human prostatic fluid: normal, chronic prostatitis, adenoma, and cancer”. International Urology and Nephrology 28.5 (1996): 687-694.
  42. Zaichick V., et al. “Method and portable facility for measurement of trace element concentration in prostate fluid samples using radionuclide-induced energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescent analysis”. Nuclear Science and Technology 27.136 (2016): 1-8.
  43. Zaichick V. “Applications of synthetic reference materials in the medical Radiological Research Centre”. Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry 352 (1995): 219-223.
  44. Burgos MH. “Biochemical and functional properties related to sperm metabolism and fertility. In Brandes D, editor. Male accessory sex organs. New York: Academic press (1974): 151-160.
  45. Gómes Y., et al. “Zinc levels in prostatic fluid of patients with prostate pathologies”. Investigacion Clinica 48.3 (2007): 287-294.
  46. Kavanagh JP and Darby C. “The interrelationships between acid phosphatase, aminopeptidase, diamine oxidase, citric acid, β-glucuronidase, pH and zinc in human prostate fluid”. International Journal of Andrology 5.5 (1982): 503-512.
  47. Huggins C., et al. “Chemical composition of human semen and of the secretion of the prostate and seminal vesicles”. American Journal of Physiology 136.3 (1942): 467-473.
  48. Zaichick V. “Sampling, sample storage and preparation of biomaterials for INAA in clinical medicine, occupational and environmental health”. In: Harmonization of Health-Related Environmental Measurements Using Nuclear and Isotopic Techniques. Vienna: IAEA (1997): 123-133.
  49. Zaichick V and Zaichick S. “A search for losses of chemical elements during freeze-drying of biological materials”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 218.2 (1997): 249-253.
  50. Zaichick V. “Losses of chemical elements in biological samples under the dry aching process”. Trace Elements in Medicine 5.3 (2004): 17–22.
  51. Zaichick S and Zaichick V. “Method and portable facility for energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescent analysis of zinc content in needle-biopsy specimens of prostate”. X-Ray Spectrometry 39 (2010): 83-89.
  52. Zaichick S and Zaichick V. “The Br, Fe, Rb, Sr, and Zn content and interrelation in intact and morphologic normal prostate tissue of adult men investigated by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescent analysis”. X-Ray Spectrometry 40.6 (2011): 464-469.
  53. Moore RA., et al. “The chemical composition of prostatic secretion in relation to benign hypertrophy of the prostate”. Journal of Urology 46 (1941): 132-137.
Citation: Vladimir Zaichick and Sofia Zaichick. “Some Trace Element Contents and Ratios in Prostatic Fluids as Ancillary Diagnostic Tools in Distinguishing Between the Chronic Prostatitis and Prostate Cancer”. Medical Research and Clinical Case Reports 3.1 (2019): 1-10.
Copyright: © 2019 Vladimir Zaichick and Sofia Zaichick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.